Not So Dinty Any Moore – Beef Stew

bef stew
It took me less than a week to devour Freakonomics.

Freakonomics is not the latest kid-focused brand born out of the brilliant cereal-marketing minds in Battle Creek, though don’t worry, I could have made that mistake at first, too. It’s a book that everyone, and I mean everyone, else has already read. And though I am always the last one, I read it in the equivalent of probably 12 hours, spread over 7 days so I’m all caught up! (But now I have to read that McIdiot Frey guy.)

I read Freakonomics for a few reasons: 1) I’m a freak, 2) I’ve gotten strange looks when people find out that I read recipes and cookbooks in bed before going to sleep, and 3) I studied economics in college and learned absolutely nothing valuable from comparisons of government spending on guns vs. butter and why firms supposedly set their prices where marginal cost equals marginal revenue (MC=MR). Somebody, please! Teach me something so that since my Economics degree can’t get me a job, I don’t feel I’ve completely wasted my (parents’) money on college tuition!

Now, I’m not going to say that I loved the book, but it was interesting and very well-written, which made it easy and fast to read. Because I have the attention span of a Cuisinart and the need for a sense of accomplishment through task-completion, easy and fast (oh dear, am I channelling RR today?) are good things (no, I believe it’s Martha).

In case you are one of the now six people who have not yet read Freakonomics, I’m going to tell you what the book is about, but in a much less sexy, much less book-sellingish way than the author’s publicist has done.

Economic analysis, especially from a buttoned-up, tweed-jacketed University of Chicago-trained economist, sounds dry and esoteric, but remember that the title of the book is Freakonomics. (By the way, I have nothing against Chicago – I almost went there for grad school before I realized that I’d slowly but surely freeze my prissy LA ass off, but I do have something against economists. I *ahem* dated one, and boy, was that as fun as a semester of Game Thoery.) This young whippersnapper of an economist, Steven Levitt, simply leans back in his Herman Miller, starts stroking his hairless chin, and after what could only be explained by a few hits off the bong that he hides in the bottom drawer of his desk, curiously asks questions of totally non-economics phenomena, sometimes juxtaposing seemingly unrelated, every-day scenarios and people like sumo wrestlers and school teachers (though that may not be so random if he actually met my 6th grade History teacher).

Levitt starts each chapter with one of these bizarre questions that he has hackingly coughed out of his mystical lungs. Then, in a brilliant slow motion wafting and containment of smoke into facts and figures, he gels together a clear, sharp, and very entertaining economic analysis. And when once 30 pages earlier you doubted if he could logically and believably prove that Real-Estate Agents are like the Ku Klux Klan (without having actually tried to purchase a home in LA), you find yourself understanding that everything can, indeed, be explained with fundamental economic principles, models, and tools like incentives and information (im)balances. You just have to be brave enough to challenge conventional wisdom and know what to measure.

My own full, detailed analysis of a book about someone else’s analysis would confuse me too much, but I am going to highlight the last two chapters of the book, Five and Six, which have to do with parenting. For some reason, as much as the in-depth investigation of the crack dens of Chicago was an interesting explanation of why drug dealers, who were previously believed to be fur-lapelled floor-length leather coat-wearing, gold chain bling-dripping, tricked out hoopdy-driving pimps, actually still live with their moms, these last two chapters are absolutely the most intriguing of the entire book.

I am nowhere near close to becoming a parent (unless adopting an English bulldog puppy in the near future counts), so perhaps my fascination with the chapter entitled “What Makes a Perfect Parent?” has to do with the fact that my sister is now a parent. I love telling her, as Freakonomics has now stipulated, that it does not matter what she does as a parent because her daughter, my niece, will do no better nor worse in life based on my sister’s “parenting techniques.”

Levitt uses standardized test scores as an indicator of success (for now I’ll ignore my opinions about theso-called “value” of such stuff as the Iowa test and how flimsy and inaccurate those test results are – I was always in the 99th percentile or something, and look where it got me!). By pitting conventional parenting factors against one another, he determines that things like whether you work or stay at home with her during the so-called “formative” years, whether you “culture” her by taking her to museums, whether you spank her or not, allow her to watch tv or not, or read Goodnight Moon to her every night or not, do not correlate at all with children’s test scores.

Monsieur Levitt proves that such “parenting” factors that were once deemed to be vital to a child’s future, in fact, have no effect on a child’s future. No effect. None. Ultimately, Levitt’s conclusion is that a “perfect parent” as measured by standardized test scores, is not determined by what parents do, but who they are.


That could seriously injure the sales on a lot of “parenting” experts’ books out there!

And I’m about to completely kill all sales of these books based on conventional parenting by showing you some living proof. Case in point: One vicious Delicious Sarah.

My mom never slow-cooked a homemade beef stew for our family when we were little. In fact,
she didn’t make too many of any of the classic “American” dishes when we were little – meatloaf, mashed potatoes, tuna noodle casserole. We mostly ate Korean food, and it was a very special occasion when we ate “American” foods like spaghetti or steak. Is spaghetti an American food? In the Delicious house, if it wasn’t Korean, Chinese or Japanese, then it was “American,” even linguine alla vongole that Mom made from Campbell’s Clam Chowder (Don’t ask. I never did.)

With the exception of steaks that were sauteed in a frying pan and eventually just doused with soy sauce and sesame oil just like galbee anyway, all of the “American” things we ate weren’t quite homemade. It wasn’t that my Mom was a flutz in the kitchen. Mom is a wizard with Asian foods, and is somehow able to magically put together a full Korean meal faster than Rachael Ray can say “How good is that?” It’s just that Mom had more exciting things to do with her life like winning golf and tennis tournaments than to spend time poring over cookbooks in search of a recipe for the perfect baked macaroni and cheese. By the way, if it means anything to anyone (and it certainly means everything to me), my Mom still plays and sweeps the local tourneys. I just have to ignore her visor-slash-inverted-satellite-dish and it’s all good.

Things like beef stew never made it to our table unless it came from a box in the freezer or a can. We knew it would be a special “American” night in the Delicious household when, at 5:00 PM, we heard the whirr-buzz of our electric Black & Decker can opener that ended with a final vacuum-pack-releasing schloop of suspiciously realistic meat product not too unlike Alpo, mixed with incredibly perfect cubes of potatoes and carrots into a microwave-safe dish. And still, we ate our Dinty Moore beef stew over rice, with kimchee.

Now if Mr. Levitt were incorrect in his economically analyzed conclusion about future-affecting factors and if the conventional wisdom about parenting, i.e. your actions as a parent do matter, were in fact true, then it would be logical to assume that I would be in a trailer park somewhere in the backwoods of Ohio eating Spam and barking like a jindo-gae (Korean breed of dog).

But that’s not the case.

Let it be known that I bark like a poodle! A very cute teacup poodle. :)

What it all boils down to (that would be “reduces down to” if you’re doing balsamic vinegar) is that if you feed your children trailer trash canned cuisine like Hormel Corned Beef Hash, you are not somehow vacuum-packing and sealing their Spam-tastic fate. Conversely, it doesn’t matter if you feed your children fois gras and caviar in hopes that they will go on to live a lifestyle of the rich and famous, and presumably take care of you in your old age in their Bel-Air mansion with live-in nursees instead of sticking you in some sorry-ass nursing home. It only matters that you do feed your children, and that you do it because you love them. Levitt says that “the things that matter were decided long ago,” factors over which you have very little control.

So whether parents feed their daughter truffled scrambled eggs with pancetta-wrapped dates, or Dinty Moore Beef Stew with kimchee and goh-choo-jahng, will have no effect because if it’s in her, she’s going to end up as fanatical Ms. Freaky F. Freakalicious food freak who slow-cooks beef stew without a pressure cooker, from scratch, and immediately blogs about it. No matter what.

And for the record, I do not now, and have never, not since my childhood, ever liked fish eggs. Ever.

Beef Stew that Has Nothing to Do with Dinty Moore

Cut 3 lbs. boneless beef for stew (chuck, short rib, round) into 1½” chunks and season liberally with salt, pepper, and any other dired herbs. You might think I’d go straight for the very Asian sesame seeds and red pepper, but ha! I used oregano and thyme. ;)

Dredge beef in all-purpose flour, shake off excess, then brown on all sides in about 2 T. olive oil in a large pot.

The conventional wisdom is that you should drain off the fat from the meat in the pot, but Freakonomics says that fat tastes pretty damn good.

Add to the pot 1 cup chopped onions, and sprinkle 1-2 tsp. of dried herbs (your choice), and pour in 3 c. beef broth. Bring to a boil, then reduce heat to a soft simmer and let cook until meat is tender. We all know that not all stoves are created equal. Mine took about an hour.

Add 5 large carrots peeled and cut into 1″ slices, 3 large potatoes peeled and cut into 1″ chunks, and 3-4 cloves of garlic, smashed. You may want to add a bit more beef broth if it has reduced down a lot. Season to taste with salt and pepper (about 1/2 tsp. each). Cook with the beef until the carrots and potatoes are soft, about 30 minutes.

I ate mine right out of the pot standing over the stove with a glass of red wine (so I guess canned food does teach you about instant gratification), but of course you might want to serve it in bowls with rice. Kimchee is highly recommended.

tags :: : : : : :

Blog Widget by LinkWithin

{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Maure February 25, 2006 at 4:24 am

I’m looking forward to this blog sarah. I too have very specific childhood memories of Dinty’s beef stew.
Summertime visits to my grandmother in Indio inevitably
resulted in a weeks diet of Dinty’s and corned beef hash – eaten in a quite-cluttered, un-airconditioned kitchen with black
widow spiders lurking just outside.

The stew looked nothing like the
photo on the label – and the taste:
Well, wouldn’t even make it into the “Gulag cooking for dummies” edition. no moore dinty’s for me.


2 Tony of Bachelor Cooking February 25, 2006 at 6:16 pm

a nasty pop up-floating ad covered the pic..

But the pic is nice dinty or not


3 Rose February 26, 2006 at 5:22 am

I actually meet Mr. Levitt–more specifically I went to a private brown bag lunch event where he was discussing his research on drug dealing hiearchies. His work is pretty fascinating when he explains it in person–very engaging speaker and discussant–really likes students, which cannot be said of other professors I have meet. I haven’t read Freakonomics yet, it’s one of those books that sits on the upper tier of my book wish list.

His main research areas used to be about the economics of drug dealing, though I think he’s added new interests into the mix. That’s probably why he spends so much time on the subject in the book.

My friends and I were discussing beef stew just the other night. One of them said her mom couldn’t make much of anything good, but her beef stew was amazing. It’s definitely a dish I can pine for in this g-d forsaken weather we’re having in the east.

Have you ever tried adding five spice to your stews? My mom does that, very asian, really nice touch, too.


4 Robyn February 26, 2006 at 6:20 am

I LOVE BEEF STEW! My mum never made it from scratch but…yeah, we got Dinty Moore. From Costco or BJs.


My mum didn’t make any classic American dishes (as for what she did make…um…I guess Chinese-ish stuff). I think we had mashed potatoes when I decided I wanted it for Thanksgiving, the uber-American holiday. I love mashed taters, yes.

I’m not a fan of fish eggs. Meh.


5 Swati February 26, 2006 at 8:15 am

Dear S,

I live in India, so, what is beef stew? Would you rate it higher than a chicken soup for the soul?

Is there a lot of esoteric stuff in the economy of drugs? It is just that someone somewhere makes a littlebit/a lot of money. Think of cigerette sales. Nicotine also kills but it is sort of legalised.

Here in India, it seems that every cool student smokes marijuana! It forms a part of rituals of some sects. So, I guess it is quite widely available and affordable. It is the designer drug scene in India that is aimed at the well-healed.

Talking of fish roe, the raw stuff has to be mixed with finely sliced onions, ditto garlic and green chillies, salt to taste and a pinch of flour to provide a binder. It has to be deep fried in mustard oil, a very very bengali thing. To be eaten with plain boiled rice and mussoor dal.

The above is plain home cooking and cannot be obtained for love or money in any Indian restaurant.

Can’t you make friends with some Indian mom? Just for the home cooking? You might even come to adore cilantro– dhania patta in North India.

When you can, come to India to eat. Try our regional stuff. On the other hand, thanks to oodles of my countrymen flooding the silicon valley, I am sure all this exists around the corner from you. You just need a guide, nay a guru to guide you through.


6 sarah February 27, 2006 at 2:49 am

maure: funny, i always found it slightly disconcerting that the vegetables were SO perfectly shaped and SO brightly colored. that can’t be natural. LOL!

tony: hm, i’m going ot have to check out why there are pop-ups coming from this site…

rose: what a great idea about adding the five spice! i think as the days get warmer, the beef stew nights will be fewer and far between, but next time, i will definitely do some experimentation.

robyn: haha! yes, i think thanksgiving was the ONE day, when we were little, that we had MAYBE a few things that were a little more “American,” but even then, we still ate turkey with rice and kimchee. :)

swati : i DREAM about making a food vacation trip to india! i am quite certain that i would have the TIME of my life! until then, i have to rely on many of the restaurants here in l.a., and hopefully, this year, i will actually try my hand at making some of my favorites in my own kitchen…well, i guess more than anything, i just want to try making naan :)


7 Sarah B. February 28, 2006 at 12:10 am

I have been reading your wonderful blog for about 5 months now. I’m a Korean American undergrad at the U of C and I just had to say something since you mentioned the Levitt :-)
I love your blog~
You are sassy!
I’m also a,


8 Grace February 28, 2006 at 6:56 am

I thought I was the only person putting their econ degree to great use reading food magazines, cookbooks, and food blogs before bedtime.

Not only did “american” food nights include the aforementioned spaghetti with clam chowder, we also had ribs made with Lee Kum Kee chinese “bbq” sauce and after much begging, we finally had turkey for Thanksgiving which my mom then basted with soy sauce and served with rice.

Love your blog.


9 sarah February 28, 2006 at 7:05 am

sarah b: you are at chicago! awesome! ar you freezing to death? lol! my friends on the east coast and midwest always think it’s weird that i ask that, as if it’s any different last winter, this winter, or next winter. :) and thanks for the love…

grace: lol! well, i think we had regular turkey for thanksgiving, but we most certainly did have rice, and kimchee. in fact, now that i think about it, i am not sure we had too many other typical American side dishes. we had bahn chan. LOL!


10 hermz March 2, 2006 at 8:58 pm

I’ve read a book full of data showing the same thing… parenting doesn’t do a whole lot. It was a book about genetics and the mind, so it went further and looked at other studies (identical twins, fraternal twins, siblings raised in differnt homes, etc. are great sources of info). It looks like who we are is determined at least 50% by genetics… some argue up to 70%. The rest is believed to depend upon with whom we socialize as children, i.e., what roles we assumed when with children our own age. Interesting stuff.


11 sarah March 2, 2006 at 9:42 pm

but isn’t it also genetics that would determine what kind of roles we choose when we are with other children? i.e. a very bossy dominant “leader” child on the playground probably takes on that role because she just IS that way. so, in essence, it’s ALL genetics.

great. no wonder my dad taught me the rule of 72 and made me read the wsj when i was five and now i read my 3 month old niece the joy of cooking. LOL!


12 Megancake April 12, 2008 at 3:42 am

I really enjoyed the book as well and I found what he said on parenting to be very interesting. I agree with you that feeding your kids certain foods with the hope that it will somehow affect their future is stupid. However, I know that feeding your kids junk at a young age makes them more prone to continue eating junk as they become adults and sets them up for an unhealthy relationship with food. Also, I read that kids develop their taste buds by age 2, and so it seems to me that people should expose their kids to different tastes by then if they want them to eat those foods a few years later. The boy I nanny for was given all kinds of foods as a baby, including spicy stuff, now he eats anything! he isn’t picky and it makes my like a lot easier. Where as his sister, who had a different caregiver when she was an infant, was not exposed to any of those more exotic flavors and is now such a picky eater. Of course this is just one family and I am generalizing, everyone is different. I just think more people should be comfortable giving Indian food and such to their kids! I know I sure as hell will.


13 sarah j. gim April 12, 2008 at 4:03 am

megancake: i think there is something to be said about tastebud development. my niece has the most interesting taste preferences for a 2-year-old and i am quite sure that we can attribute it to my sister’s feeding her things like olives, capers, mushrooms, and other things that i assumed most kids wouldn’t like.

that is probably the mistake we often make. we assume that if WE don’t like it, our kids won’t like it so we either never feed it to them, or reluctantly give it to them with some judgment already built-in, like “oh, you won’t like this.” we don’t know that for sure. we may end up being right, for much of taste is genetic, but it’s probably better to let the kids decide for themselves.


Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: